On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
It might be better, and faster, for this WG to adopt a one-paragraph draft that makes the
DS registry "RFC required", like the other DNSSEC-related registries.
You are proposing a bureaucratic solution without thinking about the
operational implications of it.
The hardest part to update in DNS tree right now is uploading DS records to the
parents, keeping the list of algorithms down helps avoid operational problems
On the contrary, lets make that list change every month, so registrars
and registries stop doing weird requirements on DS.
Or advocate for ICANN contractual updates for mandatory CDS support :P
Anyway, nothing of this is related to new algortihms and should not be
conflated with it.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
