Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40google....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020, 5:51 PM Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I think the condition might be, "both in bailiwick and in the same zone" > > meaning "in bailiwick and not below a zone cut"?
I don't think that makes sense - "bailiwick" is about glue. Maybe you could say "in the same zone (not below a zone cut)" and refer to RFC 1034 section 4.2 for the definition of a zone. > It seems to me that returning a (downward) delegation could actually be > useful. So why not include that? Additional section processing does not normally include referrals. That would be weird and new. I thought the point of the SVCB record was to appear to existing auth and recursive DNS servers as much as possible like a bog standard RR type, i.e. just wire and presentation format and a bit of normal additional section processing. Which is basically what the draft says now, though it unnecessarily respecifies additional section processing. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Mull of Kintyre to Ardnamurchan Point: Variable, mainly north or northwest, 2 to 4, occasionally 5 near the Mull of Kintyre and Tiree. Slight, occasionally smooth in shelter, becoming slight or moderate later. Fog patches developing. Moderate or good, occasionally very poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
