Greetings again. I think that all of the issues from the WG on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis have been dealt with, except one significant one. Almost a year ago, Tony Finch started a thread about 8499's definitions of bailiwick and sibling glue. The thread is <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5bKXkqzCyGE1NuUko9M6wXLD5bI/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fAopdUTnVS2mDF71eiGsRdu9zco/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PqH_WMhsP5zxRfjKD4gtmf6nw54/>
The WG should come to agreement on this so that we can close out the document. Please read these messages and comment here about changes you do or don't want to be made to the current draft. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
