Hiya,
On 19/08/2022 20:43, Warren Kumari wrote:
So, it is perfectly acceptable (in my view) for it to have: Reference Name --------------------------------- a-cool-document foo.alt another-document foo.alt yet-another-doc bar.alt
I agree that such duplicate names are acceptable in this registry. I scanned the draft quickly and think it's good. (I'll try do a closer read in a few days.) Only thing with which I'd argue for now is that I think RFC required is a much simpler rule for the registry. Any other option will require some designated experts with some guidance for those DEs, and I'd expect it to be hard for us to agree what guidance to include in the draft or not, and I'd expect it to be hard to find DEs for this registry. That said, I'd still be ok with progressing the draft if the registration rules stayed as they are now. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
