I agree; this is about utility, not necessity.  For example, AAAA records
are almost never "necessary" in glue, but they are useful, so they are glue.

On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 7:24 AM libor.peltan <libor.peltan=
40nic...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> regarding the question of "necessary" versus "useful". I apologize, but
> I must kind-of undermine the question.
>
> Imagine that a delegation is supplemented with an SVCB record that
> describes how to connect securely (with TLS) to the delegated
> nameserver. (Dunno if this really can happen today, but it's an
> imaginable situation in general.)
>
> Then the SVCB is not necessary for the DNS resolution per se, but it is
> necessary for the resolution to proceed securely. If the client's policy
> is "privacy or nothing", then they will not proceed with the resolution
> unless the SVCB is returned. As a consequence, the record is not
> necessary to some clients (but may still be useful), but necessary to
> others. Thus, the term necessary is relative and it can hardly be used
> in the definition of glue.
>
> Thank you for considering my comment :)
>
> Libor
>
> Dne 03. 11. 22 v 22:48 Benno Overeinder napsal(a):
> > Dear WG,
> >
> > With the DNSOP rfc8499bis interim in September, we had the action
> > point to send two questions to the DNSOP WG to find consensus on the
> > bailiwick and glue discussion.
> >
> > You can find the interim meeting material here
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-dnsop-02/session/dnsop
> > and the recording of session here https://youtu.be/wY7-f40lDgU.
> >
> > This is the second email to the WG, focussing on the definition of glue.
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 2. Definition of Glue provided by Duane Wessels on the DNSOP WG mailing
> >    list:
> >
> >    "Glue is non-authoritative data in a zone that is transmitted in the
> >    additional section of a referral response on the basis that the data
> >    might be necessary for resolution to proceed at the referred name
> >    servers."
> >
> >    On the mailing list, we have seen a discussion about "necessary"
> >    versus "useful".  In this context glue is defined to be exclusively
> >    A/AAAA records (traditional understanding), or do we also consider
> >    other RRtypes to be glue, e.g. SCVB/HTTPS or DS records? Concern is
> >    that "useful" may lead to a definition that is too broad.
> >
> > Taking the last point a step further: if the definition is expanded
> > and glue-is-not-optional becomes a requirement then responses may grow
> > in size and exceed fragmentation/truncation thresholds and lead to
> > more TCP.
> >
> > Remark by WG during interim meeting: One might need a registry for
> > RRtypes being glue (in the future).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -- Suzanne, Tim and Benno
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > DNSOP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to