On 6/20/23 17:51, Paul Wouters wrote:
parent. IN NOTIFY CDS scheme port scanner.parent.
Why a new RRtype ?
Why more stuff in the APEX?
Why not:
_notify_cds.parent. IN CNAME targetservice.parent.
targetservice.parent. IN A .....
targetservice.parent. IN AAAA .....
Personally, I'm fine with simplifying to your approach; I would only add the
child label prefix to allow for per-child flexibility (and if you don't need
that, just set a wildcard).
The authors' thinking was that a new record type would allow both specifying
the port and a scheme field, anticipating that people might appreciate
flexibility for future mechanisms and stir discussion about that. But if it's
not needed -- the simpler the better!
Peter
--
https://desec.io/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
