Thanks Bob, I will revised it. Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu> 于2024年1月10日周三 22:23写道：
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:19 AM Lanlan Pan <abby...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have submitted a new draft to discuss the faked answer returned from >> the recursive resolver. >> >> Your comments are appreciated. >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> 发件人： <internet-dra...@ietf.org> >> Date: 2024年1月10日周三 16:11 >> Subject: New Version Notification for >> draft-pan-dnsop-explicit-forged-answer-signal-00.txt >> To: Lanlan Pan <abby...@gmail.com> >> >> >> A new version of Internet-Draft >> draft-pan-dnsop-explicit-forged-answer-signal-00.txt has been successfully >> submitted by Lanlan Pan and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-pan-dnsop-explicit-forged-answer-signal >> Revision: 00 >> Title: Explicit Forged Answer Signal >> Date: 2024-01-10 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 6 >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pan-dnsop-explicit-forged-answer-signal-00.txt >> Status: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pan-dnsop-explicit-forged-answer-signal/ >> HTMLized: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pan-dnsop-explicit-forged-answer-signal >> >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document describes that recursive resolver should give explict >> signal in the forged answer. >> >> Client could react more clearly based on the explict forged answer >> signal, to protect user on security and privacy. >> >> > Without commenting on the merits of this, > This section: > > 1. Background and Motivation > > Recursive server may replace a forged answer to a query with a > configured answer of the authoritative server > > Seems reversed. It should be: > > 1. Background and Motivation > > Recursive server may replace a configured answer to a query > from the authoritative server with a forged answer > > -- > Bob Harold > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
