On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 4:40 PM Matthew Pounsett <[email protected]> wrote: > This isn't a very serious suggestion, but if SVCB is too much, and > registering your own RR type seems like something you don't have the > appetite for, then perhaps consider the SVC record. It's definitely > overkill, because it includes priority, weight, and a port number that > you (probably?) don't need, but it's certainly far simpler to work > with than SVCB.
This was meant to talk about SRV as an option, not SVC. Not sure where that came from. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
