On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 05:33:48 +0900 (JST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: >> > the issue here is NOT whether or not DHCP-assigned, but the stability >> > of IPv4 address. i'm not sure what is the best way to phrase it. >> >> Are there specific problems of stability of such an address? Could >> you elaborate? > > changing NS for x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.2.0.0.2.ip6.int. every hour is not > pretty. the draft is for 2.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. please, can you help with peoples acceptance of this reverse space? it is time to cut code to look in ip6.arpa FIRST. soon, it will be time to not look in ip6.int at all. see attached slide. the Y axis is packets per minute... > > i reread the draft and i guess i commented on general issue, not > specific to paragraph 3 on page 7. > >itojun >. >dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ >web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html >mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html -- George Michaelson | APNIC Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PO Box 2131 Milton QLD 4064 Phone: +61 7 3858 3150 | Australia Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 | http://www.apnic.net
xip6.png
Description: Binary data
