David Meyer wrote:
> In any event, we
> should adhere to the publication standards.
Sure. Even IDs have their own rules, which is a lot less
strict than those for RFCs, though.
The question is on the publication standard as WHAT?
> Seems to me that we should publish it as informational to
> capture the work that has been done.
That's too bad. :-)
Seriously speaking, then, we should publish all the proposals
as separate RFCs or put more explanations in the draft so that
no additional explanations are neccesary.
Have you really confirmed it with ADs? I'm afraid you have.
Masataka Ohta
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
