On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:41:13AM -0400, Ralph Droms wrote:
>> I agree with Thomas and Rob that "IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server
>> Information Approaches" should be published as an RFC so that the content of
>> the document is retained permanently. I like Thomas' suggestion to
>> eliminate the dependency on publication of the specific drafts as RFCs by
>> including a summary description of the basic approach in those drafts and
>> recommend we make that change to "IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server
>> Information Approaches".
For the most part, we can declare WG consensus on the
publication issue (i.e., clearly we want to capture this
work this time out).
Regarding logistics:
The extended WCLC for this document ends today. What I
would like the authors to do is as follows:
(i). Eliminate normative references as proposed by
Thomas (http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02959.html)
(ii). Address the comments from Ohta-san
(http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02966.html)
(iii). Address the comments from Pekka
(http://www.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg02967.html)
Once this is done, post a the -02 draft to the I-D
repository and we'll send it on to our ADs.
Thanks,
Dave
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
