Mark Andrews wrote: >>> I meant that the *specification* for SRV includes definition of underscore >>> naming and that the use of the underscore naming convention -- defining whe >> re to >>> place the SRV RR's -- *does* cause wildcarding not to work. >> Can you please explain in more detail what you mean here, and preferably >> give examples? I don't think anyone is saying there is no room to improve >> SRV, but if it's demonstrably broken then fixing it needs to move up the >> priority list, hopefully before DNSSEC N gets wide[r] deployment. > > A better description is that the expected usage pattern > doesn't work with wildcards. It does however work with all > published names provided there is enough space for the > prepended labels.
Thank you. Yes. That is *much* better wording for what I meant. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
