An HTML-version of this newsletter is available at 
http://www.fnf.org.ph/enewsletter/ltm052005.htm

**************************************************************
Liberal Times Manila

A monthly newsletter of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation’s Philippine Office
   
**************************************************************
Dear friends of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation,     30/5/2005

In last month’s issue, I wrote that working with young liberals and their 
organizations has always been a favourite occupation. In this sense, May has 
been particularly eventful and rewarding. The Young Liberals and Democrats of 
Asia, or YLDA, held their workshop on “Running a Successful Political Campaign” 
in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, where I slipped into the role of the co-facilitator. 
During the five-day activity, 25 young activists from 12 countries presented 
issue-based and electoral campaigns. One main objective from our side was to 
teach the young activists that all good campaigns are based on strategic plans. 
In the end, the group laid the groundwork for YLDA’s own campaign promoting 
political rights for the youth. For more information go to www.yldasia.org.

The day we got back from Indonesia, the Kabataang Liberal ng Pilipinas (KALIPI) 
held a youth forum at our premises in Makati City. Stormy weather did not 
prevent 70 young liberals from showing up and engaging in lively debates on the 
past, the present and the future of political youth activism. Just a few day 
later, I had a meeting with the KALIPI leadership where we discussed a series 
of joint projects such as educative activities aimed at promoting liberalism 
among the young generation, communications planning and media training.

Next time you visit our premises you will note a new sign at our entrance: The 
office of YLDA is now under the same roof as the Council of Asian Liberals and 
Democrats (CALD) and the liberal Foundation. “This location is proof of the 
close relationship and the bonds of friendship that unite the liberal 
movement,” said Congressman Nereus Acosta, Ph.D., executive vice president of 
the Liberal Party (LP) and honorary chairman of KALIPI at the formal 
inauguration held on May 18, 2005 attended by many friends from the diplomatic 
corps, the media and the liberal family. For more information and pictures go 
to www.fnf.org.ph.

“Legislative Initiatives on Political Party System Reforms,” was the topic of a 
workshop organized by our partners at the “National Institute for Policy 
Studies” (NIPS) on May 23, 2005 in Pasig City. The various pending bills in 
both Houses of Congress on political party reform were presented and discussed; 
such as those dealing with such vital issues as campaign financing, public 
funding of political organizations and the prohibition of political 
“turncoatism.” The speakers agreed that political reforms, and particularly the 
reform of the political party system, are crucial for improving governance and 
also economic development. Inspired by the workshop, I wrote a commentary, 
excerpts of which are attached to this note. You may find the full text at 
www.fnf.org.ph/liberalopinion/2005-05-30-faltering-democracy.htm

Last but not least, I want to call your attention to what promises to be an 
informative and educative affair. While everyone agrees that call centers have 
become a booming industry in the Philippines, there is also concern that the 
dynamic growth of the outsourcing branch may not be sustainable. Tomorrow’s 
public forum organized by the Foundation for Economic Freedom (FEF) and 
co-sponsored by the liberal Foundation will deal with this important issue. 
Check out www.fnf.org.ph for a detailed program. Secretary Florencio Abad of 
the Department of Education will be the keynote-speaker. “Butch,” as his many 
friends and admirers call him, has not only proven a capable secretary, he is 
also an eminent leader of Philippine liberalism.    

Thank you and kind regards

(Dr. Ronald Meinardus)

*************************************************************
The monthly Liberal Times Manila newsletter informs about activities of the 
Friedrich Naumann Foundation in the Philippines and beyond. This issue has been 
sent to 1628 individuals and organizations. If you do not wish to receive our 
messages anymore, please return this note and put “unsubscribe” in the subject. 
More information on recent FNF-activities is waiting for you at www.fnf.org.ph.
**************************************************************
Faltering Philippine Democracy (Excerpts)

…  In a democratic context, low popularity ratings and disenchantment with 
political leadership are not unusual. On the other hand, political rule is 
always bound by time-limits; elections give the people the opportunity to judge 
and replace leaders they dislike or find ineffective. In this sense, political 
elections assume a stabilizing role as they provide the opposing forces a 
chance to assume power in a constitutional manner. One crucial condition for 
this political stability is that political contenders play by the basic rules 
(usually codified in the constitution). Conceding defeat after the elections 
and acknowledging the winner is one important element in what may be termed the 
consensus of democrats. 

In the Philippines, this consensus does not exist. This deficiency becomes 
particularly visible after elections, as losing candidates have a hard time 
admitting defeat. ``You either win elections, or you are cheated,’’ is a 
popular explanation of this phenomenon in a country in which electoral fraud 
and vote-manipulation remain a depressing routine. Up to this very day, the 
opposition forces have refrained from publicly accepting their defeat in the 
presidential elections held well over a year ago. Politicians of the opposition 
constantly challenge the political legitimacy of the presidency. Worse still 
for the incumbent: Many Filipinos seem to believe that Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo 
cheated her way into the presidential palace in May 2004. 

In these days, the efforts of the opposition to undermine and eventually bring 
down the president are focused on allegations that members of the first family 
are on the pay of syndicates running illegal lottery.  …   The government has 
denied the allegations and characterized them as yet another plot in a long 
series of destabilization efforts. ``Destabilization’’ has become one of the 
buzz words in today’s Philippine political jargon. Typically, retired military 
officers who have seen better days and now perceive themselves as national 
saviors are at the center of the extra-constitutional schemes. Military 
interventions in domestic affairs have a long tradition in this country. But 
compared to the coup attempts in the 1980s, the more recent threats to the 
democratic constitutional order appear feeble. 

While political observers in Manila agree that today there is no imminent 
danger of a military junta taking power with popular support, several 
commentators concur with what influential Filipino columnist Amando Doronila 
has recently termed ``an increasing nostalgia for strongman rule.’’ 

As a foreigner actively engaged in promoting democracy in this country, I 
disagree. While opinion polls show that four out of five Filipinos say that 
``democracy may have problems,’’ the same polls also reveal that an 
overwhelming majority believes that democratic governance is ``better than any 
other form of government.’’ The available empirical data show that the Filipino 
masses are not craving for a fascist dictator (they have had enough of that 
during the rule of Ferdinand Marcos). They are longing for strong, effective, 
and at the same time, accountable political leadership. In this regard, the 
president has obviously not met popular expectations. … 

Poor governance is not only an issue with the Philippine public, the media and 
the opposition. The quality of government (or the lack of it) and its 
detrimental effects for society are dealt with in a recent survey published by 
the World Bank entitled Governance Matters IV. Governance Indicators 1996-2004. 
The study evaluates the governments of 209 countries and rates their 
performance in six governance related fields: human rights, political 
stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, the rule of law and 
finally the control of corruption. 

For the Philippines, the report contains only bad news. Compared with 2002 and 
1998, the scores in all six categories went down in 2004. The drop was 
particularly sharp regarding the rule of law and political stability, where 
this Southeast Asian nation is ranked in one category with countries like 
Zimbabwe, Uzbekistan and Haiti. 

The World Bank report’s main point is that governance has a direct impact on 
the economy. In short: Good governance is a precondition for economic 
advancement and higher living standards _ and not the other way around. The 
message for the politicians is clear: if they want to improve the economic 
conditions of their constituents _ and one would want to assume that this is 
the ultimate goal of all political forces _ then they must start with bringing 
their house into order politically. In this regard, the political class in the 
Philippines still has a very long way to go. 

© The Korea Times, May 27 2005 




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Internet and Democracy Across Asia:              MAY 2001
Online Trends in Governance, Civil Society and Media
More information at:  http://www.e-democracy.org/do
Rule: No more than two posts a day per participant.

To SUBSCRIBE, send e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/do-asia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to