*** Democracies Online Newswire - http://www.e-democracy.org/do ***


From:
http://www.rand.org/publications/randreview/issues/rr.12.00/

See the cover story ...

Twenty years from now, by the year 2020, the information revolution
will have altered life on this planet even more dramatically than in
the last 20 years, according to the experts. Even if they hesitate to
specify exactly what the technological changes might be over the next
two decades, the experts offer even more intriguing insights into how
those technological changes could, in turn, change us as people, as
nations, and as a global web of human thought and action.

With regard to technological breakthroughs, the fear of forecasting
the future is forgivable. Back in 1980, a mere 20 years ago, almost
no one could have predicted the explosive growth of the World Wide
Web. The Arpanet was then the U.S. defense department's precursor of
the Internet, which later did lead to the emergence of the World Wide
Web. But in 1980 there was still no hypertext language for navigating
from web site to web site, still no graphical interface, nothing like
today's chat rooms, no laptop computers, and no cell phones, let
alone cell phones that could deliver e-mail via satellite.
Conversely, predictions that once seemed reasonable now appear naïve
in retrospect. It's already the year 2000, for example, but cars
still can't fly.

With regard to overall technological trends, on the other hand,
efforts to anticipate the future are more than exercises in futility.
While it is risky to predict the future in detail, it may be even
more foolish not to prepare for it at all, especially when the future
promises to bring changes as swift and pervasive as those made
possible by the information revolution.

Consequently, several U.S. government agencies have asked RAND to
take the lead in broadly outlining what may lie ahead and boldly
deducing the implications for government and society. The work has
proceeded on three fronts: (1) to chart the future course of the
information revolution throughout the world over the next 10-20
years, (2) to identify potential forms of global governance that
might become necessary as a result, and (3) to suggest a national
"information strategy" appropriate for a global information age. The
research sponsors include the National Intelligence Council, a small
center of strategic thinking within the U.S. intelligence community;
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which created the
original Arpanet in 1969; the White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy; and the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Although the three strands of research have proceeded independently
of one another, they build on each other in compelling ways.

To chart the future course of the information revolution, a team of
researchers led by Richard Hundley has initiated a series of
international conferences of leading computer scientists, defense
planners, and policy analysts. One conference, devoted to
technological trends, looked beyond Moore's Law--the expected
doubling of the density of integrated circuits on a silicon chip
every 18 months or so--to envision the likely effects of information
technology on various countries, regions, and cultures. Another
conference considered the political, economic, and social
consequences already affecting many parts of the world. Subsequent
conferences will chart the course of the revolution in greater detail
in Latin America, Europe, and Asia. The participants already agree
that the information revolution will affect all nations, albeit in
different ways.

To identify forms of global governance that might be necessary for
the information age, Francis Fukuyama and Caroline Wagner highlighted
three models of political and social organization that could
complement the nation-state: distributed decisionmaking, citizen
councils, and nongovernmental organizations. These models function
not as hierarchical systems of control; rather, they involve broader
swaths of the body politic in transnational deliberations. This
attribute will be critical for any new system of governance to be
effective, the researchers conclude.

... end of clip ...

^               ^               ^                ^
Steven L. Clift    -    W: http://www.publicus.net
Minneapolis    -   -   -     E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  -   -   -   -   -    T: +1.612.822.8667
USA    -   -   -   -   -   -   -     ICQ: 13789183


*** Please send submissions to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]     ***
*** To subscribe, e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]          ***
***         Message body:  SUB DO-WIRE                  ***
*** To unsubscribe instead, write: UNSUB DO-WIRE        ***

*** Please forward this post to others and encourage    ***
*** them to subscribe to the free DO-WIRE service.      ***

Reply via email to