On Thursday 22 December 2005 05:19, Michael Foord wrote: > Hmmm... I submitted some plain text (might have been reST actually) docs > as a suggested addition to urllib2. The response from the maintainer) > was that I ought to submit it as patches against the original Tex > document.
Did you submit this as a documentation issue on the SF tracker? If this is still outstanding, please point me to the submission. > *However* - there was no implication that the maintainer was happy to > work with plain text submissions. This sounds like a specific individual isn't interested in converting to LaTeX, which isn't surprising (though unfortunate). We'll have to find a better way to handle this, since I don't want to be turning away plain text contributions due to format. I hope it wasn't me, in a moment of madness. :-/ -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
