Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > On Thursday 22 December 2005 05:19, Michael Foord wrote: > > Hmmm... I submitted some plain text (might have been reST actually) docs > > as a suggested addition to urllib2. The response from the maintainer) > > was that I ought to submit it as patches against the original Tex > > document. > > Did you submit this as a documentation issue on the SF tracker? If this is > still outstanding, please point me to the submission. >
I submitted it as a patch in the documentation category. (probably hence the response which effectively says 'this isn't a patch'). https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1216942&group_id=5470 > > *However* - there was no implication that the maintainer was happy to > > work with plain text submissions. > > This sounds like a specific individual isn't interested in converting to > LaTeX, which isn't surprising (though unfortunate). We'll have to find a > better way to handle this, since I don't want to be turning away plain text > contributions due to format. > > I hope it wasn't me, in a moment of madness. :-/ > No - I would have responded privately. It was John J Lee - who does a sterling job of maintaining the code he creates. I'm happy to do more work on making the document suitable for inclusion. All the best, Fuzzyman http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml > > -Fred > _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
