John Gabriele wrote: > On 5/20/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Neal Becker wrote: >> >>> There is an effort as part of numpy to come up with a new system using >>> docstrings. It seems to me it would be unfortunate if these two efforts >>> were not coordinated. >> I don't think so. The issue with numpy is getting our act together and making >> parseable docstrings for auto-generated API documentation using existing >> tools >> or slightly modified versions thereof. No one is actually contemplating >> building >> a new tool. > > Actually, I believe Ron Adam is working on that. See his previous > posts regarding his updates to pydoc. He's been asking for folks to > have a look at his code, in fact. :)
Sorry, I thought the context was clear. "No one [as part of numpy] is actually ...." Better? -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
