Robert Kern wrote:
> John Gabriele wrote:
>> On 5/20/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Neal Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is an effort as part of numpy to come up with a new system using
>>>> docstrings. It seems to me it would be unfortunate if these two efforts
>>>> were not coordinated.
>>> I don't think so. The issue with numpy is getting our act together and
>>> making
>>> parseable docstrings for auto-generated API documentation using existing
>>> tools
>>> or slightly modified versions thereof. No one is actually contemplating
>>> building
>>> a new tool.
>> Actually, I believe Ron Adam is working on that. See his previous
>> posts regarding his updates to pydoc. He's been asking for folks to
>> have a look at his code, in fact. :)
>
> Sorry, I thought the context was clear. "No one [as part of numpy] is actually
> ...." Better?
>
I'm not addressing the actual formatting of the doc strings directly. But
I am making it so the doc string from a class or object can be pre or post
formatted in some way if desired.
I'm going to try to put up some example web pages soon. They won't be
quite as impressive as Georg's though. :-)
Cheers,
Ron
_______________________________________________
Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
