On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Julien Palard via Doc-SIG <doc-sig@python.org> wrote: > Hi,
> Nice to hear, I have a question as someone proposed a few weeks ago to > translate to bengla [1], should'nt you start both translating "bn" and when > done forking it to "bn_IN" to specialize the translations? > > Note that I have no idea of the differences and similarities between bn and > bn_IN. > We have two variations, bn_IN and bn_BD, the words are different enough that we should have both translated separately. Please have a look at the locale names at [1] for glibc. We should have bn_BD and bn_IN, not simple bn. [1] https://lh.2xlibre.net/locales/ Kushal -- http://fedoraproject.org http://kushaldas.in _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - Doc-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
