Tom

A couple of things:
1. check the FO output to see what that area looks like. With the example I 
used, here is the output:
          <fo:block id="id522069" text-align="center">
                <fo:external-graphic src="url(images/basicFlow.svg)" 
width="5in" height="auto" 
                                      content-width="scale-to-fit" 
content-height="scale-to-fit" 
                              content-type="content-type:image/svg+xml" 
text-align="center"/>
          </fo:block>  
Make sure the image/svg+xml shows up.

2. Try adding the 'format="SVG" ' to the imagedata line
                  <imagedata align="center" fileref="basicFlow.svg" width="5in" 
format="SVG" />

Dean
Dean

In a message dated 12/02/10 12:14:55 Pacific Standard Time, 
tom.brow...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 14:09, deannelson <deannel...@aol.com> wrote: 
> Tom 
> What actual problem are you having? 

Dean, I'm using db 5 and fop 1.0 on Ubuntu and get the following error: 

Dec 2, 2010 2:05:08 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent 
SEVERE: Image not available. URI: ./images/era-1.svg. Reason: 
org.apache.xmlgraphics.image.loader.ImageException: The file format is 
not supported. No ImagePreloader found for ./images/era-1.svg (See 
position 25375:172) 
Dec 2, 2010 2:05:08 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent 
SEVERE: Image not found. URI: ./images/era-1.svg. (No context info available) 

My docbook code looks pretty much like that that has been shown here. 
Here's my db source for the problem figure: 

<figure id="era-1"> 
<title>A section of a typical Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA) device</title> 
<mediaobject> 
 <imageobject role='html'> 
   <imagedata 
      align='center' 
      width='5.5in' scalefit='1' 
      fileref="./images/era-1-96dpi.png" 
   /><!-- was: width='100%' --> 
 </imageobject> 
 <imageobject role='fo'> 
   <imagedata 
      align='center' 
      width='5.5in' scalefit='1' 
      fileref="./images/era-1.svg" 
   /> 
 </imageobject> 
</mediaobject> 
</figure> 

Thanks. 

-Tom 

Reply via email to