Hi, Peter and Thomas, @Peter: It seems that figure is a valid element, however, the numbering of figure for structures would conflict with the numbering a normal figure. As long as there is no possible was to have a "proprietary" counter for structures (as figures) structures do not have an independent numbering. I wonder since there are an awful lot of chemical papers where there is an independent list of structures, that none of them has been prepared with docbook. Otherwise there would be a solution already.
@Thomas: since the structures are svg as well as most figure in my book, I have considered svg. However, than I would lable a contruct of structures, but not the individual ones. Coming from LaTeX, the numbering of figures was always a simple use of apropriate macros. Regards Bernhard Am 12.10.2018 um 14:28 schrieb Thomas Schraitle: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018, 14:12:15 CEST schrieb Bernhard Kleine: >> In my second mail to this threat a showed a complex table with >> structures, arrows labeling etc. I cannot envisage this without a table >> structure. > As Dave already pointed out, a table might not be the appropriate way to > layout things. > > Have you considered SVG? With SVG (or any other vector format) you can do all > the fancy stuff (arrows, labeling etc.) that you need. > > -- spitzhalde9 D-79853 lenzkirch bernhard.kle...@gmx.net www.b-kleine.com, www.urseetal.net - thunderbird mit enigmail GPG schlüssel: D5257409 fingerprint: 08 B7 F8 70 22 7A FC C1 15 49 CA A6 C7 6F A0 2E D5 25 74 09
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature