> Thanks Norm. Yes, that can be an interesting way. I've heard about that, but > I'm not so much into this topic ATM. As far as I know, the above tools are > commercial. Do you know an open source solution?
https://www.print-css.rocks/ lists a couple in addition to AH and PrinceXML. I haven’t tried them. I’m surprised there aren’t more, TBH. > I can fully understand your position. :) I'm sure it's fun, especially when > you come from a XSLT 1.0 background. That's a huge step forward. On the other > side, it's also a huge task, I guess. ;) It’s bigger than a bread box, perhaps, but it’s not a gargantuan task. The FO stylesheets in the 1.0 and 2.0 projects probably contain most of the answers one needs, it’s just a question of restructuring them into modern, XSLT 3.0 with a rationalized set of options. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> https://nwalsh.com/ > 'All is vanity,' saith the Preacher. But if all were only vanity, who > would mind? Alas, it is too often worse than vanity: agony, darkness, > death also.--Thomas Hardy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
