Stas Bekman wrote: > > have we agreed on this as a general fontface? > > if not we really ought to - its quite important IMO. > > if we have so, we need to talk about sizes ... > > you mean font-family? or what?
yes. currently we have font-family: helvetica, verdana, sans-serif; maybe it should be something like font-family: helvetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif; or even better IMO: font-family:verdana, helvetica, arial, sans-serif; i actually always thought that helvetica was more a macintosh-system font and that it wasn't default installed on win-platforms? don't know about other platforms. > > btw, why do we have a <div>-tag inside a table-cell? > > why, is this wrong? the sgml checker doesn't say anything about it. > Neither your checker. theres nothing wrong with the syntax, the question should have been "what is the point of having the <div>-tag there, isn't it just a waste of html?" why not just use something like: <td class="table-cell" align="center"> and then apply whatever fonts etc needed for that kind of table cells. ./allan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
