Stas Bekman wrote: > from my tuning of the css for the guide, I think people were happy with: > > helvetica, arial, sans-serif; > > so I guess: > > helvetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif; > > will do too.
+1 > > or even better IMO: > > > > font-family:verdana, helvetica, arial, sans-serif; > > > > > > i actually always thought that helvetica was more a > > macintosh-system font and that it wasn't default installed > > on win-platforms? don't know about other platforms. > > I don't know. We can try with what you suggest and then fix later if > people complain or doesn't find find it satisfactory when doing a review > on various platforms before we go live. -1, if it aint broke dont fix it :-) > >>>btw, why do we have a <div>-tag inside a table-cell? > >>> > >>why, is this wrong? the sgml checker doesn't say anything about it. > >>Neither your checker. > >> > > > > theres nothing wrong with the syntax, the question should > > have been "what is the point of having the <div>-tag there, > > isn't it just a waste of html?" > > > > why not just use something like: > > <td class="table-cell" align="center"> > > and then apply whatever fonts etc needed for that kind of > > table cells. > > For a simple reason of wrap_box template being a wrapper for many things > which use different classes. So as a quick solution, I've just thrown > the <div> in, since it's passes with the content. But I suppose that the > proper, clean solution, is to pass the class name as an argument to the > template and let it use this argument as a class for <td>. sounds pretty cool! ./allan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
