>Agreed :) I'll try and help out too. XHTML is very >interesting, that's for >sure. >Maybe we could go with Strict: there is almost only CSS used >in this site, >although I'm not sure if XHTML allows things like align="right", etc.
Well Strict is just that - Strict (very). You can use aligns, if they are provided by CSS or within an embedded "style" tag. Like our sites policy, XHTML (Strict) is all about seperating content from presentation. Our site is mostly CSS driven, and the conversion should be relatively simple (even for strict).
However, "Transitional" allows us to use tags that Strict won't - which I think is massively important for backward compatibility (ie: those browsers that don't support CSS).
I'm not so sure we need those "extra" tags. We already rely massively on CSS2, and any browser that doesn't support CSS will render the page incorectly anyway. We could test it with strict XHTML and see how it goes; if it doesn't work out, we try Transitional.
-- Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
