Stas Bekman wrote: > > Jonathan M. Hollin wrote: > > Are there any plans to validate the new site as XHTML? > > I've validated parts as HTML 4.01 via validator.w3c.org, > if anybody is willing to validate against XHTML > and send the relevant patches, that would be cool. > Thanks. > p.s. if we make the site XHTML complient will it still properly render > in older user agents that aren't aware of XHTML?
i don't think this is a very good idea (at least not at this stage). the whole site has been developed for months according to one dtd. changing it now, we will probably only run into a lot of side problems if we want 100% validation. ./allan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
