Hi!
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:14:17PM +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > I made some changes to sites.html. I was wondering if you liked it like I > did it (add short bold text summarizing how that organization is using > mod_perl). > http://users.skynet.be/pereinar/mod-perl/outstanding/sites.html > > Tell me what you think (and Stas can go ahead and commit it if it's ok). It looks better than the old version, as it is more concise, but on the other hand there is too much bold text (name of project plus the author results to 4 or 5 bold word in a row (sometimes)).
What about merging the info in this document with all those success stories?
There are some redundanties already (e.g. imdb.com), and I like the design of the success stories (a list of links to a page for each story) better than the long row of sites/stories, seperated only by a paragraph (and some bold text, as in your new version). But if we merge (I'm feeling like some multinational exec, talking about mergers all the time ...), we should change the design and content of the success stories and remove all those email-specific stuff (fixed font, quoted mails..)
I personally do not understand why one item is a success story and one a site running mod_perl ... Don't know about the rest of you, though...
Thanks a lot Thomas, that was one point I forgot to talk about.
Yes, I wanted to do that too, for the longer ones. However, some entries are too short to appear as success stories. I consider success stories to be some information about deployment, the results it gave, etc, as opposed to just a small entry about what the company does and that it just uses mod_perl.
-- Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
