At 20:57 18.06.2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
Sorry I posted this to the wrong list earlier. Here it is again, in the
right list.

No problem :) Just that we need to discuss matters further here.

Stas has already responded to the effect that if it is kept bare-bones
and minimalist, like it is at the moment, with pointers to the more
detailed documentation and examples, that it would be acceptable, but
that we want to avoid duplication in order to avoid getting out of sync.
I agree with this sentiment.

I feel like Stas on this matter: I had been thinking of a small reference like this, pretty practical. It would probably fit in somewhere in the docs. Some things though:
- you will have to supply instructions on building the resulting HTML file (and preferably a bare-bones HTML that can be fitted into the site automatically)
- we need 2 versions: mod_perl 1.0 and mod_perl 2.0



-- Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to