Rich Bowen wrote:On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
I know, it is gravely lacking, and needs help. And I intend to do something about that. But I have a few questions before I burn a lot of time on that.
OK, so, given the various comments, I gather that the following. The document itself meets with general approval, as a concept. We should leave it exceedingly simple, and provide links to additional documentation in the guide, where available.
Currently it has no fit into the mod_perl documentation. I don't see anything in this doc which is already not covered in the docs that I've committed just a few days ago:
http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html
http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/user/handlers/handlers.html
All these people who comment in favor of your doc, haven't even seen what we have already and don't know what has been planned.
What I was saying that if you prefer to still keep it, don't extend on it, but provide pointers to directives discussions. Which I'd also hold off, because the 2.0 docs are on move and their layout will change a lot as more docs get written.
It's true that Stas has done a wonderful job for those 2.0 docs, which shouldn't be neglected. However we don't have such reference docs for 1.0, so that might be useful. And I'm sure we could make the 2 docs co-exist happily. But one thing's for sure, we're proud of our docs and don't want to replace them :-)
-- Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
