According to Chris: > Is it a known and accepted fact that FancyIndexing generates > invalid HTML? FancyIndexing puts invalid tags inside the <pre> block. > I'm inclined to report it, but perhaps it's accepted for improved > appearance. If that's so, FancyIndexing shouldn't be on by default > (it is in Mac OS X 10.4 Server and RHEL4, and of course minotaur).
Well, if you set "IndexOptions SuppressIcon SuppressRules" it becomes valid HTML 3.2 output. ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
