On 11/8/06, Lars Eilebrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to Chris:
> Is it a known and accepted fact that FancyIndexing generates
> invalid HTML? FancyIndexing puts invalid tags inside the <pre> block.
> I'm inclined to report it, but perhaps it's accepted for improved
> appearance. If that's so, FancyIndexing shouldn't be on by default
> (it is in Mac OS X 10.4 Server and RHEL4, and of course minotaur).
Well, if you set "IndexOptions SuppressIcon SuppressRules" it
becomes valid HTML 3.2 output.
Or IndexOptions HTMLTable, which is in the suggested config for 2.2.
But yes, it is known and has been that way for years. If it isn't
documented, then it probably should be.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
