Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Which just goes to show why I stated in my original email that I
wasn't interested in nitpicking the design with a bunch of back-seat
quarterbacks. Everyone has different opinions about what constitutes
good design. I was trying to adopt something that had a pretty-obvious
consensus positive opinion.
Just because the PRC is happy to redesign www.apache.org without so much
as a whisper on the site-dev list does not mean there was consensus. It
is difficult to adjust www.apache.org because of the overlapping
stylesheets
are fairly screwed for edits. In any case, I've got way better things to
do then this.
Roy,
We are all very busy people, and this kind of bike shedding doesn't get
us anywhere.
I believe it is an improvement, and we can build incrementally on it,
and work through the issues you and others have raised.
Therefore, I am +1 adopting the design.
-Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
