On Thursday 24 April 2008 22:31:56 Paul Querna wrote: > Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >> Which just goes to show why I stated in my original email that I > >> wasn't interested in nitpicking the design with a bunch of back-seat > >> quarterbacks. Everyone has different opinions about what constitutes > >> good design. I was trying to adopt something that had a pretty-obvious > >> consensus positive opinion. > > > > Just because the PRC is happy to redesign www.apache.org without so much > > as a whisper on the site-dev list does not mean there was consensus. It > > is difficult to adjust www.apache.org because of the overlapping > > stylesheets > > are fairly screwed for edits. In any case, I've got way better things to > > do then this. > > Roy, > > We are all very busy people, and this kind of bike shedding doesn't get > us anywhere.
I do not agree in all points with roy, but he is absolutely right about the consensus. I am sorry to say this, but I felt overran by the new layout. I did not demur, because the changes are made. But I am getting really angry, if we want to base our changes here on the consensus for www.apache.org. Again: -1 from me Kess --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
