* Nick Kew wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:07:55 +0900 > > Takashi Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The attached patch stops noting down a outdated warning to XML of > > translations. > > +1 in principle > -0 to this exact patch > > I agree with what you're trying to do. But I'd be more > enthusiastic about it if we added a mechanism to flag that > a translation is indeed grossly outdated. > > At its simplest, perhaps something like: > * Document last updated 2008-05-17 > * [foo] translation last updated 2006-11-03 > > would indicate a document likely to be out of date, whereas > > * Document last updated 2008-05-17 > * [foo] translation last updated 2008-11-03 > > tells the reader the translation is current. In case this isn't clear, the comment to be removed is not for readers, but a working note for translators. Additionally (read: conveniently) it's the source for the "outdated" trigger in the transformation process, but that's a different thingy. nd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
