On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Sophie Gautier <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/12/2010 08:42, David Nelson wrote: >> >> Hi Sophie, :-) >> >> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 13:19, Sophie Gautier<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Alfresco doesn't handle xliff files and doesn't propose any l10n >>> services. >>> So it mays not serve for i18n or only to publish the final .odt >>> conversion >>> once the work done. >> >> So as someone who has used it before, what would your comments be on >> Alfresco as a tool for the US English documentation team? > > Yes I think so, it's easy to use and should cover almost all your needs. > I, for myself, prefer version control systems (bad habit, even working with > Eyrolles, my publisher, I do not use CMS here ;), but that might be to > technical for authors. > At least, if I remember well, that was one of the reasons, Jean and her team > didn't like the OOo workflow and settled OOoAuthors, where people like Alex > or me did like it. > So Alfresco should definitely be better for the en_US workflow.
I have had a bit of a brainstorm here. It will take a few days to put together the idea proposal so people understand it, but I should have it out by boxing day. It deals with documentation development across languages, feeding back into an approval system per language. Mike Wheatland -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
