On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 13:27 -0300, Rogerio Luz Coelho wrote: > For docs or for devs? > > Rogerio > > > 2011/6/10 planas <jsloz...@gmail.com> > > > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 10:04 +0000, toki wrote: > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On 09/06/2011 21:38, Jean Weber wrote: > > > > > > > I don't know what this will mean for us in the OOo and LibO docs > > groups, but I am concerned about the potential for further fragmentation of > > a small group of docs people into working on several > > > projects. > > > > > > If The Apache Software Foundation does what they normally do with > > > projects, there will not be a binary release of Apache OpenOffice.org. > > > There will only be a source code release. > > > > > > The onus will be on third parties to deliver binaries. > > > > > > Given the history of third party distribution of OOo binaries, I suspect > > > that tracking the third parties that deliver binaries that are either > > > based upon, or exclusively Apache OpenOffice.org code to non-trivial. > > > > > > I don't see typical OOo end-users grabbing the Apache OpenOffice.org > > > source code, and compiling it for their system. > > > > > > > We really need to work on better ways to reuse material without time > > consuming rebranding > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > OTOH, I'm not sure how much material will be reusable. > > > In updating _OOo in a Multi-Lingual Environment_, my original theory was > > > to include OOo4Kids, and OOoLight. Due to the differences between those > > > programs, and OOo, I had to either write: "This can not be done using > > > OOo4Kids" or else write a completely different set of instructions. > > > Instructions that, as often as not, did not work with either OOo, or > > LibO. > > > > > > > by automating everything we can and choosing not to do some > > > non-essential things that can't be automated. > > > > > > The practical issue is: > > > * Which existing OOo derivatives/variants should the Documentation > > > Project track; > > > * What criteria should be used, to determine which new > > > derivatives/variants should be tracked; > > > > > > Existing OOo derivatives/variants are: > > > # FLOSS: > > > * GO-Oo; > > > * BrOffice; > > > * LibreOffice; > > > * OOo4Kids; > > > * OOoLight; > > > * OpenOffice.org; > > > * OxygenOffice; > > > > > > # Proprietary: > > > * 602Office; > > > * Co-Create Office; > > > * EuroOffice; > > > * KaiOffice; > > > * MagyarOffice; > > > * MyOffice 2007; > > > * NeoOffice; > > > * NextOffice; > > > * OfficeOne; > > > * OpenOffice Pro; > > > * OpenOffice UX PL; > > > * OpenOffice PL; > > > * RedOffice; > > > * StarOffice/Oracle OpenOffice; > > > * Symphony; > > > * ThizOffice; > > > * UPOffice; > > > * WPOffice; > > > > > > I put that list together, based on various pages on the web. Not all of > > > those programs are still distributed. > > > > > > > > > jonathon > > > - -- > > > If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting. > > > > > > If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth > > > requesting. > > > > > > DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > > > > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN8ewkAAoJEERA7YuLpVrV8HEH/RukCJDYCR5T7WteFqAu0Iw3 > > > Udp2F49WQynqzsr/B4dFTX17PwL/oDVZDLqtNgpDykcyqK1nOVRB4X8KUt9Vf8y9 > > > GOyVOBAQjp9Tc3zxbsp8UdPbErSVfkBD4Nwvy7Ht+WDZkGy35xqgINS/MkvE50E7 > > > XM2ZNbojVUNLrF609mgPLZddKEReB4+aKaPZa+vijuC+vdPAlTIz6FsBBOpARbEg > > > WiaihWK8s9sDKfpuad1Q5TJOqZ5vMd7pfqfnhnEZC/gHEav9vVQcOMWdT6fjyf21 > > > 8o1Zab0SwXD95hN/4FHfVMWF9rH1fhMoNWLnT+q2AH9xBO9AzNvkatSvoTNiJvY= > > > =F9A9 > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > > Do we want to track KOffice and Calligra as well? They have some > > interesting ideas that we should probably look at. > > -- > > Jay Lozier > > jsloz...@gmail.com > > > > -- > > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > > documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org > > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ > > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > > deleted > > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted >
I was thinking of following the projects, maybe even borrowing some good ideas from each. I like some of the KWrite/Calligra page work layouts but dislike how Kwrite works. -- Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
