Kent-Andre Mardal wrote:
> I did not get to test uBlas, but on my machine the assembly process
> (mass matrix) in the attached script took 5.3s with PETSc and 6.1s with
> Epetra.
>
Thanks. We could add this somewhere under bench/.
I get an error for the uBLAS case,
File "test_various_backends.py", line 28, in <module>
backend = uBlasFactory.instance()
NameError: name 'uBlasFactory' is not defined
Any ideas?
Garth
> Kent
>
>
> ons, 30.04.2008 kl. 09.36 +0100, skrev Garth N. Wells:
>> It looks like the necessary functions for assembly using Trilinos as a
>> back end are in place, so I was wondering if anyone has had a chance to
>> compare the assembly performance of the various linear algebra back ends?
>>
>> Garth
>> _______________________________________________
>> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
