Kent-Andre Mardal wrote: > I did not get to test uBlas, but on my machine the assembly process > (mass matrix) in the attached script took 5.3s with PETSc and 6.1s with > Epetra. >
I tested with all three back ends, and the differences were very small. Garth > Kent > > > ons, 30.04.2008 kl. 09.36 +0100, skrev Garth N. Wells: >> It looks like the necessary functions for assembly using Trilinos as a >> back end are in place, so I was wondering if anyone has had a chance to >> compare the assembly performance of the various linear algebra back ends? >> >> Garth >> _______________________________________________ >> DOLFIN-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
