On Sunday 06 September 2009 18:32:18 Garth N. Wells wrote: > Anders Logg wrote: > > Should we swap the meaning of () and [] for parameters in C++? > > > > Access is most commonly made to parameters, not nested parameter sets, > > so swapping the two would make the Python and C++ interfaces more > > similar.
I agree. I was never satisfied with the present c++ solution. This is better. Johan > The more similar the interfaces are the better. > Garth > > > -- > > Anders > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > > DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org > > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev