On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:05:47PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > On Sunday 06 September 2009 18:32:18 Garth N. Wells wrote: > > Anders Logg wrote: > > > Should we swap the meaning of () and [] for parameters in C++? > > > > > > Access is most commonly made to parameters, not nested parameter sets, > > > so swapping the two would make the Python and C++ interfaces more > > > similar. > > I agree. I was never satisfied with the present c++ solution. This is better. > > Johan
ok. I'll fix it, probably tomorrow. -- Anders > > The more similar the interfaces are the better. > > > Garth > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > > > DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org > > > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > > DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org > > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev