On 07/07/11 22:35, Anders Logg wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:21:26PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:20:44PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote: >>> >>> Is the plan for 1.0-beta to fix >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ffc/+bug/787010 >>> >>> and then release? >> >> Yes + decide on the interface for NonlinearVariationalProblem. > > Bug is fixed so we can make a release as soon as the buildbot has > tested my branch and the fix has been merged into main, and we have > decided on the interface for NonlinearVariationalProblem. >
Bug fix coming, so wait a bit. Garth > -- > Anders > > >> >> It would be good to hear more comments on the two suggestions: >> >> 1. (current) >> >> NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, rhs, u, bcs, [J]) >> >> This is consistent with LinearVariationalProblem and the solve() >> functions; same order of arguments. >> >> 2. (Garth) >> >> NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, u, bcs, [J]) >> >> This removes the unnecessary rhs argument which always has to be >> zero. >> >> I think there are good arguments for both but not very strong so it's >> a matter of taste. >> >> I'll try to fix bug 787010 now. I'm on vacation so I'm working slower >> than usual. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
