On 07/07/11 21:21, Anders Logg wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:20:44PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
Is the plan for 1.0-beta to fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ffc/+bug/787010
and then release?
Yes + decide on the interface for NonlinearVariationalProblem.
I think that should be all.
Brilliant.
It would be good to hear more comments on the two suggestions:
I am fairly indifferent.
--
Marie
1. (current)
NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, rhs, u, bcs, [J])
This is consistent with LinearVariationalProblem and the solve()
functions; same order of arguments.
2. (Garth)
NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, u, bcs, [J])
This removes the unnecessary rhs argument which always has to be
zero.
I think there are good arguments for both but not very strong so it's
a matter of taste.
I'll try to fix bug 787010 now. I'm on vacation so I'm working slower
than usual.
--
Anders
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
