I personally feel that "implementation simpleness" should be traded off with "definition simpleness". In other word since multiple languages are trying to be targeted, as well as those we can't yet know about because they do not yet exist, I feel the "simple" answer is to right an interface that might well be more difficult to code than the current API *BUT* can be much more easily documented and much more easily understood as to what it take to perform a desired operation.
So *I* don't mind more coding since I'll no longer be thrashing around trying to understand why my "simple code" [sic] does not work. ;)
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:24:00 -0400 "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/19/2005 11:17 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] noted that:
I can't help but feel that a really simple to interface to API would be a benefit to Tucows.
I'd agree with that. It would be very helpful if "simple" was defined to some degree.
-- Regards,
-rwr
"In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one indispensable condition for social progress."
- Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)
_______________________________________________ domains-dev mailing list [email protected] http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-dev
