James wrote:

> Actually the land rush is just heating up. With players such as Google and
yahoo >catering to this portion of the market specifically. We feel there is
plenty of steam left.

I would agree. Now that Google has implemented an aging filter (sometimes
called the sandbox), new domains can take up to 2 years to gain results in
the Google SERPs. Everyone is looking for older domains that have already
served this time (esp. those before 2001) and have back links. The old
domain business is becoming more important than ever.

Even if Google makes moves to cut down these benefits, the branding
advantages of having a good domain name would keep our interest there. I'm
in support of Tucows on this; we need some access to this market. If they
weren't making moves in this area I would be quite disappointed.

There seems to be a real split here of opinions. I keep finding this is
between the people who believe domains are 'owned' and those that see
domains as 'rented'. I'm in the latter group. 

Even with this tightening of the deadlines and the expiry of the invoice
date, people are *not* having their domains taken away from them. James has
addressed this point here:

>The name will be held in escrow, available to the former registrant to
renew for the >full 80 days that is currently allowed. Any deviation from
this timeframe is >unacceptable to me and us as a company. Even if we have a
winning bidder willing to >pay 100K for a domain, the former registrant can
get his name back through existing >means.

I'm not quite sure what additional safeguards you want them to put into
place? 

It maybe because I'm outside the US, where they seem quicker to call their
lawyers than to pull out the credit card - but this looks a good service to
me


Best Regards,
 
Nick 
 
Managing Director
e3internet
http://www.e3internet.com 
 
 
  
 
 

_______________________________________________
domains-gen mailing list
[email protected]
http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

Reply via email to