On Sep 13, 2006, at 8:01 PM, Andrew McCallum wrote: > Paul Gordon wrote: >> On Sep 13, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Andrew McCallum wrote: >> >> >>> This actually spawned an interesting discussion here today with >>> Paul and >>> others because of the recent migration of COM/NET from RRP to EPP. >>> >> >> Speaking of EPP, is there someway you can streamline the transfer-in >> process so that we can stick that stupid EPP transfer code into the >> same screen as the opensrs generated confirmation code? >> > I'm not too familiar with the behind-the-scenes mechanics of the > transfer confirmation system but I can see what can be done.
Thanks. > >> Another thing - shouldn't the moving to the EPP system - with this >> code requirement - negate the need for the silly 60 day new name >> transfer ban that no one ever asked for? >> > > From what I gather it was implemented because there were too many > cases > where a fraudster would register a domain and then transfer through a > bunch of Registrars to put years on it and obscure the trail, which is > why the same cool down period applies to transfers. It became more > difficult to get the domain deleted once the stolen card was outed and > many companies (ab)used along the way would be out of pocket. Well if that REALLY is the reason, there should be a mechanism whereby if either the losing or gaining registrar can vouch for the registrant (long business relationship pershap) then the 60 day transfer ban can be switched off. Just an idea to present to ICANN to be ignored, I guess. _______________________________________________ domains-gen mailing list [email protected] http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen
