More data.

Regards

Deid Reimer

 

Received: from hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net (hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net 
[216.40.35.252])
        by mercury.horizon.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4G0uLvT023137
        for xxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 15 May 2007 17:56:21 -0700

Received: from mp.opensrs.net ([216.40.33.45])
        by hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1HnTvC-0008U5-08
        for xxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 14 May 2007 02:20:38 -0400

Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by mp.opensrs.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA19188;
        Mon, 14 May 2007 02:19:20 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 02:19:19 -0400 (EDT)


Arthur wrote:
> John Peacock wrote:
>> Arthur wrote:
>>> That's part of the problem. We've received todays renewal reminder on 
>>> time and shortly afterwards the one from yesterday. A cc receipt took 
>>> approximately one day, some renewal confirmations still aren't here. 
>>> Mail from other parties arrives as usual. So I'm with Matthew that the 
>>> problem is somewhere on Tucows' side.
>> Have you actually analyzed the Received: lines on the stale messages to 
>> see precisely where the message was stuck?  Feel free to post them here 
>> and I will annotate them.  The first two (reading from the bottom) are 
>> likely to be the only servers internal to Tucows, but the whole chain 
>> can include interesting tidbits for those who can read them (and sadly, 
>> I can read them in my sleep)... ;-)
> 
> Theoretically our server could have stalled all connections from 
> hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net and let everything else through, but I don't 
> see any failed connection attempts on our logs. The backlog seems to be 
> on hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net while hrs-mx1 seems to work properly 
> (judging from a rather small sample):
> 
> Delayed:
> Received: from hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net (216.40.35.252)
>    by xxxxxxx with SMTP; 16 May 2007 16:00:32 +0200
> Received: from mp.opensrs.net ([216.40.33.45])
>       by hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
>       id 1Ho0Tu-0008Av-0A
>       for <xxxxxx>; Tue, 15 May 2007 13:06:38 -0400
> 
> Delayed:
> Received: from hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net (216.40.35.252)
>    by xxxxxx with SMTP; 16 May 2007 06:13:10 +0200
> Received: from mp.opensrs.net ([216.40.33.45])
>       by hrs-mx2.registrarmail.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
>       id 1HnnL3-0004zu-07
>       for <xxxxxxx>; Mon, 14 May 2007 23:04:37 -0400
> 
> Not delayed:
> Received: from hrs-mx1.registrarmail.net (216.40.35.251)
>    by xxxxxxx with SMTP; 16 May 2007 05:02:56 +0200
> Received: from mp.opensrs.net ([216.40.33.45])
>       by hrs-mx1.registrarmail.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
>       id 1Ho9mr-0001up-08
>       for <xxxxxxx>; Tue, 15 May 2007 23:02:49 -0400
> 
> Arthur
> 
> _______________________________________________
> domains-gen mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
domains-gen mailing list
[email protected]
http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

Reply via email to