Don't worry, Sunshine. If I had my way, you guys would be running com/ net at $2 a pop!
On Oct 31, 2007, at 3:15 PM, elliot noss wrote: > two things. even better than what is suggested below, let it go to > ICANN completely as a setoff against the fee levied against each > name. by doing this it would directly reduce, and I believe > eliminate, the tax charged against each name. and please remember > that with our new pricing this would not benefit us AT ALL (before > we are accused of blatant self-interest). > > second, please (and this is not directed at you paul, but at this > discussion in general) do not even include verisign as a possible > recipient. they have absolutely no claim to the revenue. .com is a > public good and they are simply a contractor performing a service > in respect of that good. > _______________________________________________ domains-gen mailing list [email protected] http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen
