Yes, I know all about DROA and the notices they send out very early.
We do keep all of our client domains locked, and have warned clients
in the past.

This is an account we just acquired from a designer who went on to
other pursuits, so I don't know the history except that the domain
was never registered with us. It is currently with DROA, and it is
DROA/Namejuice showing their own expiry date which is earlier than
the Internic WHOIS. I know that DROA sometimes has a wrong date in
the mailed notices because they may have made their mailing list
before the actual registration provider made a renewal. In that case
they are wrongly reporting someone else's expiry date. But in the
case I am asking about here, they are reporting a wrong date for a
domain in _their own system_. I worry that it could get deleted
prematurely because of this inconsistency. Could that happen?

Jo 



-----Original Message-----
Hey Jo,

DRoA has for a long time sent renewal notices by snail mail to  
customers of other registration providers.  My understanding is that

these notices are sent based on information in the public whois  
records, which of course is in violation of the terms of use of the

Whois database.

When this started, we had a number of customers be send payment  
thinking this notice was coming from us.  It's important to make
sure  
your customers keep their domains locked, and you should take also
use  
the Whois privacy service to keep their postal and email addresses  
shielded.

I've seen expiry date discrepancies like this in notices that we  
received (for customers using our whois privacy service).  This is I

think due to whois data being old and out of date.  It's unrelated
to  
the root whois record showing an additional year of time.  That  
happens when a domain is temporarily renewed during the grace
period.

If you'd like more info on this, feel free to contact me privately.

Thanks,

Doug.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Register4Less.com


Quoting Jo for Groups and Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Anyone seen this before?
>
> Internic WHOIS reports:
>      Expiration Date: 31-may-2010
>
> DROA reports:
>     Expiration date: 2008-05-31
>
>
> I often see it the other way around with Internic showing the
earlier 
> date - the registrar is renewing one year at a time even though
you 
> paid for several ... but their own WHOIS normally reports all the 
> years you paid. Anyone have a clue as to what DROA is doing here?
Do 
> you think the client in danger of having his domain drop? We'd
like to 
> inform ourselves as much as possible before advising the client.

_______________________________________________
domains-gen mailing list
[email protected]
http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

Reply via email to