On Monday, 18 April 2022 20:26:36 BST Patrick Wigmore wrote:
> If there isn't a suitable route to 192.168.0.0/24 on the VPN client
> computer, then manually adding one temporarily might be a worthwhile
> experiment.
Hmmm. I've been struggling to find the correct iptables command to do that.
Should this be a direct route from 10.1.10.1 to 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.0.30 to
192.168.0.1. Also should the protocol be NAT? Whatever I've tried so far
doesn't seem to show up when I list the current rules, so I've been unable to
confirm or deny that this was the problem.
> It seems you've got me hooked on this puzzle, Terry. I was only going
> to write a few paragraphs here, to clarify my previous remarks!
Sorry about that. :-)
--
Terry Coles
--
Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2022-05-03 20:00
Check to whom you are replying
Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk
New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
