> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, vus...@test123.ru wrote: > >> Outlook is best email client. Even 2003. The only missing thing is >> inability to do imap-search request directly to imap server. > > I won't say Outlook is the worst email client I've ever seen, but we > all know that 'best' and 'Outlook' can only be in one sentence if it > is accompanied by 'alternative to'... Alternatives were: Thunderbird, Evolution, TheBat. Should I try something else? I want to write HTML messages easy (use fonts, colors, numbered lists), embed screenshot images in emails by simple Print screen - copy buttons, integrate email meeting requests with calendar.
> > If you are on Windows, have MSOffice, don't need to administer lots > of computers, and email in only one US-ASCII or ISO-LATIN1 supported > language, then you might want to consider using Outlook. I've seen > too many of my clients ordering me to install Outlook and then > running in all kinds of trouble. Even as far as some changing to > Squirrelmail because that at least enabled them to communicate with > their colleagues in Russia etc. So Outlook is an answer only if > you're prepared to face the consequences. Squirrel mail, are you serious? Did you try horde/IMP? Outlook2003 indeed had problems with KOI-8/Win1251, but it was long-long time ago. I communicate in Russian a lot - no problems in last 3 years, not even one.